Metro Airports Analysis Consortium Idea Blooms

Airport groups offered and received help through Aviation Watch for many years. "Airport Noise" in various forms and places resulted in protests, lawsuits, and occasionally changes in airport management.  Over the years, airport noise was encapsulated by US DOT and FAA laws and rules (i.e. 14 CFR Part 150 and Part 161).  Airlines successfully lobbied to stuff all protests of overflights into these grinders until protestors were exhausted and disillusioned. 

In the social media age, anyone can put out a web site named "Quiet Skies" this or that and many have.  We have a problem in that the title funnels the actions into limited practices and Rules.  Even the Congressional Quiet Skies Caucus's boldest proposal 55 DNL and over mitigation under 14 CFR Part 150 would by no means result in noise or pollution reductions and mitigation can be evaded by noiser flights over more people using more overflight courses per day.

So, with help from other groups promised, we are taking two small steps toward a reduction in aviation noise and pollution per actual flight --by shortening the length and time of the average trip and reducing airport operations involved in the average trip.

Go to

1, We're oganizing a technical base for airport capacity plan protests called, for the moment, the Special Meto Airports Analysis Consortium (US) 

2. We are hosting the Aviation Watch blog.  


Showing 4 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Smaac Forum Panel
    commented 2019-02-24 15:21:34 -0600
    We have sponsors for a bill/amendment and want to add as many co-sponsors as possible: Who are the US Representatives from your city?
  • Smaac Forum Panel
    commented 2019-01-06 17:20:22 -0600
    The AvWatch blog is at for now.
  • Smaac Forum Panel
    followed this page 2019-01-06 17:10:24 -0600
  • Russ Harris
    commented 2018-10-22 13:25:52 -0500
    Will there be an endorsement in the Governor or 2020 Senate contest? What should Members consider, if anything, from the panel’s musings? Should being PO’d with the MAC and Dayton extend to Sen. Smith?